

AI governance has crossed a threshold. It is no longer reserved for the largest organisations with big compliance teams. Between the first and second quarters of 2026, the share of privacy job postings mentioning artificial intelligence jumped from 14% to 36%, spanning banking, retail, mining, telecommunications and government.
Employers now expect privacy professionals to design and run governance programs across the whole AI lifecycle, not simply flag risks after a system goes live.
The high-profile mishaps in AI model training in recent months has only made governance even more of a top priority across organisations, which is also reflected in the growing popularity of the Artificial Intelligence Governance Professional (AIGP) certification for people in the privacy, governance, risk and compliance space.
So what does successful AI governance require?
Every credible governance framework rests on a foundation of ethical principles, and this is the right place to begin. Whether you look to Australia’s eight AI Ethics Principles, the NSW Government’s five mandatory principles, the EU’s seven requirements for trustworthy AI, the NIST framework, ISO 42001 or the OECD’s principles, the same themes recur: respect for human agency, privacy and data governance, fairness and non-discrimination, individual and social wellbeing, transparency, and accountability with proper oversight.
The task is to translate some version of these principles into commitments that fit your organisation’s context and risk profile. Principles are the starting point for governance because they give every later decision, from procurement to deployment, a consistent reference point.
Successful governance assigns clear responsibility, whether through a governance committee or defined roles within existing teams, and backs that up with transparency about how and where AI is used. Accountability turns good intentions into practice, ensuring that when an AI system behaves unexpectedly, there is a person, a process and records enabling you to respond.
Effective governance is continuous because risks such as bias, inaccuracy and loss of transparency can emerge at any phase. Algorithmic impact assessments, close cousins of the Privacy Impact Assessments many teams already know, are becoming standard practice. They are conducted throughout a system’s life rather than once at the outset.
The AI governance professional is crucial to steering organisational choices at each step in the AI Lifecycle including:
Designing and building the system. Govern the design choices, technical architecture decisions and build-stage risk controls. Many protections are cheapest and most effective when built in here, rather than bolted on later. Filtering out personal information, for example, is a control designed in at this stage.
Collecting and using data in training and testing. Make sure the data used to train and test the model was lawfully obtained and can be lawfully used for that purpose, and that its quality, provenance and documentation are established and recorded.
Evaluating deployment risk and assessing the system. Before go-live, run an algorithmic impact assessment, the AI counterpart to a Privacy Impact Assessment, to test for bias, accuracy and transparency and to decide whether the residual risk is acceptable for the intended use.
Release: Govern of the transition to production, for example doing a shadow launch without affecting real customers or members of the public.
Governing the system once deployed. Monito performance for drift and error, maintaining and updating the system, keeping human oversight, and having an incident response plan for when something goes wrong – these are all core governance challenges.
Organisations do not need to build governance from a blank page. Australian federal and state governments have produced a substantial and practical body of guidance. State frameworks add further depth, from NSW’s mandatory AI Assurance Framework to Western Australia’s requirement for AI Accountable Officers and use-case registers. Even organisations outside government will find these resources valuable.
For organisations, conventional privacy training doesn’t cover AI-specific risk, and AI training skips privacy and regulatory obligations. Rather than compete for scarce specialist hires, upskill your existing team. Organisations can benefit when people from a variety of professional backgrounds move into AI governance.
AI governance is a core skill.
If you are a professional in an adjacent field, consider upskilling yourself. Whether you are from IT, law, risk and compliance, or even considering branching out into something new with a lot of career potential. Credentials such as the IAPP AI Governance Professional (AIGP) certification are the most efficient and practical route.
You can read more about the Privacy 108 AIGP course here. Or contact us via the form below if you have any questions.
"*" indicates required fields
"*" indicates required fields
Privacy 108 collects your name and email to send you our newsletter. If you do not provide this information, we will be unable to send it to you. We may use third-party service providers (such as email marketing platforms) to distribute our communications. Some providers may store information overseas, including in the United States. For more information about how we handle your personal information, including how to access or correct it or make a complaint, please see our Privacy Policy or contact us at hello@privacy108.com.au. You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails or by contacting hello@privacy108.com.au.