

A US medical malpractice lawsuit (scheduled for trial in November 2022) alleges that a hospital fraudulently failed to disclose an IT outage caused by ransomware to its patients. In this case, healthcare providers couldn’t access electronic medical records or foetal monitoring due to the ransomware attack. Had they been able to, the monitoring would have shown that the plaintiff’s unborn baby was in distress. In its absence, the baby was born with her umbilical cord around her neck resulting in severe complications. She ultimately (and tragically) passed away after months in intensive care.
You can read more about this here: https://www.databreachtoday.com/lawsuit-hospitals-ransomware-attack-led-to-babys-death-a-17663
With potentially fatal real-world consequences (and with the civil liability landscape for cyber security incidents still in nascent stages), it is unsurprising that regulators around the globe are increasingly turning their head to enforcement for lax cybersecurity. Recently:
In addition to increased cybersecurity enforcement, ASIC has expressly announced its intention to intensify its focus on cyber security in its Corporate Plan for 2021 – 25. In fact, cyber security is one of its four external priorities:
“Supporting enhanced cyber resilience and cyber security among ASIC’s regulated population, in line with the whole-of-government commitment to mitigating cyber security risks”
While ASIC’s cybersecurity enforcement capabilities only reach registered companies, financial markets, financial services providers, and credit services providers, organisations outside these industries should still consider the potential impact of global trend towards enforcement for lax cybersecurity.
The Australian Government, in its discussion paper on Australia’s cyber security strategy, reported that 40% of medium and large-sized Australian businesses did not have any cyber security governance or framework in 2018.
The paper goes on to suggest three options for cyber security risk management in Australia, before seeking feedback on the potential solutions:
Option 0: Maintain the status quo.
Option 1: Voluntary governance standards for larger businesses.
Option 2: Mandatory governance standards for larger businesses.
The reforms considered include “stronger cyber security standards for the digital economy, more transparent information about cyber security, and stronger legal remedies for consumers.” The paper also contemplates how the voluntary standard would “strengthen and complement existing director’s duties…”, potentially heralding a future where directors may be held personally liable for cyber security incidents.
We’ve covered the proposed changes to cyber security regulation here.
Australian organisations must start to strengthen cyber resilience, cyber security frameworks, and organisational processes to respond to rising pressures and increased cybersecurity enforcement. The specialist team at Privacy 108, led by one of Australia’s foremost privacy experts Dr Jodie Siganto, work with medium and large-sized organisations to develop robust cyber security frameworks. Our cybersecurity lawyers offer:
For more information, get in touch:
"*" indicates required fields
"*" indicates required fields
"*" indicates required fields
Privacy 108 collects your name and email to send you our newsletter. If you do not provide this information, we will be unable to send it to you. We may use third-party service providers (such as email marketing platforms) to distribute our communications. Some providers may store information overseas, including in the United States. For more information about how we handle your personal information, including how to access or correct it or make a complaint, please see our Privacy Policy or contact us at hello@privacy108.com.au. You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails or by contacting hello@privacy108.com.au.